Today we hear about ergonomically designed fitness equipment, ergonomically designed chairs, sofas, and seats in cars and airplanes, ergonomically designed clothes and shoes, ergonomically designed tools, ergonomically designed doors, stairs, and even lighting. Since this word is used so often these days, I decided to look up the definition. Ergonomics is defined as, "The study of problems of people in adjusting to their environment. The science that seeks to adapt work or working conditions to suit the worker" (Webster's New World College Dictionary). This has been expanded to apply to the diverse needs of our modern society. There are laws that regulate ergonomics in public places and businesses and even churches. Special accommodations are mandated for the handicapped and disabled such as ramps instead of stairs, automatic doors, and specially designed restrooms in all new construction. Recently the sidewalks in our neighborhood were torn up at the intersections so that ramps could be installed to accommodate wheelchairs. Also ramps are required for access to platforms or stages in auditoriums and theaters and even churches. Merchants have found that it is economically beneficial to be ergonomically correct.
As I considered this topic, I wondered how ergonomically compatible our churches really are. Do we strive to make visitors feel welcome and comfortable? Do we provide a friendly atmosphere? Have we provided for the integration of new converts into the church body? Are we sympathetic to the needs of those who are struggling with inherited and acquired weaknesses? Do we provide a progressive and comfortable process for the growth of babes in the faith to grow into spiritual maturity? Have you ever walked into a church that made you feel uncomfortable? Were the front steps too steep? Was the door open? Were you ushered to a seat or to a visitors' Bible study class? Were the pews hard, the music too loud, the temperature too hot or cold? Was the sermon frivolous? Was the church ergonomically compatible to your spiritual needs?
Even more important than having ergonomically sensitive churches is our attitude toward our own spiritual needs. Do we put our own comfort ahead of the needs of the church and the gospel commission? The Apostle Paul set an example of sacrifice for the sake of the gospel. He endured hardship, deprivation, persecution, and even torture in his labor for others and yet he was satisfied with his lot (Phil. 4:11). He was not concerned with ergonomics when it came to his life of sacrifice and service. Should we not also be willing to put aside, if necessary, our own ergonomic comforts for the finishing of the work? Jesus said that if we are not willing to leave father or mother or everything for His sake, we are unworthy of Him. So when it comes to service for Jesus, we should be contented with our lot and not on being "ergonomically correct."
